![]() |
|
Long title | An Act to amend the law relating to innocent misrepresentations and to amend sections 11 and 35 of the Sale of Goods Act 1893. |
---|---|
Citation | 1967 c 7 |
Territorial extent | England and Wales |
Dates | |
Royal assent | 22 March 1967 |
Status: Amended
|
|
Text of statute as originally enacted | |
Text of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk |
Misrepresentation Act 1967 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, which regulates English contract law and unjust enrichment, so far as relevant for misrepresentations.
Where a person has entered into a contract after a misrepresentation has been made to him, and—
or both, then, if otherwise he would be entitled to rescind the contract without alleging fraud, he shall be so entitled, subject to the provisions of this Act, notwithstanding the matters mentioned in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
(1) Where a person has entered into a contract after a misrepresentation has been made to him by another party thereto and as a result thereof he has suffered loss, then, if the person making the misrepresentation would be liable to damages in respect thereof had the misrepresentation been made fraudulently, that person shall be so liable notwithstanding that the misrepresentation was not made fraudulently, unless he proves that he had reasonable ground to believe and did believe up to the time the contract was made the facts represented were true.
If a contract contains a term which would exclude or restrict— (a) any liability to which a party to a contract may be subject by reason of any misrepresentation made by him before the contract was made; or (b) any remedy available to another party to the contract by reason of such a misrepresentation, that term shall be of no effect except in so far as it satisfies the requirement of reasonableness as stated in section 11(1) of the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977; and it is for those claiming that the term satisfies that requirement to show that it does.
1967 Contract